Eternal Sunshine #152
January 2022
By
Douglas Kent
- 911 Irene Drive, Mesquite, TX 75149
Email: dougray30@yahoo.com
On Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/270968112943024/ or on the web at http://www.whiningkentpigs.com/DW/. Follow on Twitter at @EternalSunshDip. Also be sure to visit the official Diplomacy
World website at http://www.diplomacyworld.net.
Sign up for the Eternal Sunshine Mailing List
at https://mailchi.mp/45376bbd05df/eternalsunshine
Check
out my eBay store at http://stores.ebay.com/dougsrarebooksandmore
Quote of The Month – “It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I
can't stand.” - (Brian Stimpson in “Clockwise”)
Welcome to Eternal
Sunshine, which just won the 2021 poll for Favorite Monthly Diplomacy
Zine Published in Mesquite, Texas. It
may be a minor award, but it’s mine, and you’re all jealous whether you want to
admit it or not.
I hope everybody had a good, safe, and healthy New Year,
Christmas, Chanukah, Yule, or whatever you do or do not celebrate. As usual, I spent my holidays home alone with
Sanka. I even
got jipped out of a New Year’s day
off, as it fell on a Saturday this time around.
(When it falls on Sunday I get Monday off, but if it falls on a Saturday I do NOT get Friday off). In general I regard
New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day as the most overrated of all major holidays,
mostly thanks to TV and movies. In my
life I’ve had two really good NYE experiences, some horrid ones, and the rest
are basically forgettable. I suppose
there’s still time to add another, but I appear to be stuck in a multi-year
“this is your life, it’s over, just get used to it” rut of unimaginable
dimensions.
Besides that…well, I can’t think of
anything that happened over the last issue worth mentioning. I guess I should mention that the latest
Diplomacy World was released, and it turned out to be a decent issue all things
considered. If you haven’t read it, you
can check it out at http://www.diplomacyworld.net. As well as every issue of Diplomacy World
ever published, all available for download in pdf format, for free.
One
of the things you’ll find in that issue are letters and comments showering
praise on Conrad von Metzke, who announced recently
the immediate fold of his zine and his cessation of GMing
games. However, I am very pleased to
announce that (with a slight prodding from me), Conrad has agreed to begin a
new subzine in Eternal Sunshine. The title he’s chosen is “Not Tonight, Dear,
I Have a Deadline.” You can find the
first issue elsewhere in this issue of ES.
Let’s give Conrad the usual welcome…nah, that’s rude. Be nice to him.
Anybody else want to jump in the shallow end of the pool?
I guess that’s it from me for now.
See you in February!
Game Openings
Diplomacy (Black Press):
Signed
up: Kevin Wilson, Gavin Begbie, need five more to start.
By Almost Popular
Demand:
Ongoing.
Join in and play NOW!
Where in the World is Kendo
Nagasaki?: Ongoing.
Join in and play NOW!
Also in Andy York’s Subzine – You can find his ongoing “Hangman, By Definition”
and Facts in Five, plus an opening for Breaking Away.
Standby List: HELP!
I need standby players! – Current standby list: Andy York, Andy Lischett, Paul Milewski, Harold Reynolds,
Jack McHugh, Brad Wilson, Graham Wilson.
Meet Me in Montauk
The Eternal Sunshine Letter Column
Paul
Milewski: Wednesday morning my son Geoffrey and my
daughter Ginger, both of whom live out of town, showed up at my front door unannounced
to tell me that my eldest son, George, is dead.
His body was discovered in his apartment (a neighbor noticed the smell
and called the police). So far as we
know, he died of COVID or from complications.
In any event, natural causes. He
lived alone and was reclusive by nature.
Actually, that's putting it mildly.
None of us knew where he lived and he didn't keep in touch with
anyone. We've learned he had been sick
for weeks and was on an extended medical leave from work at Amazon when he
died. He would have been 52 years old
today, his birthday (Dec. 11). There are
some things in life that can't be described in words. Some are good and some are bad. This is bad.
I am trying to cope but not doing a very good job of it, though my wife,
Sandee, tells me she thinks I'm doing pretty well. My wife's oldest son, Jason, has moved in
with us. He's 41, single, and if it's of
any significance, gay, though that's unimportant to me. He's a nice guy, calm, thoughtful, honest,
and not doing well. He was evicted from
his apartment in Dayton, Ohio for nonpayment of rent. Jobless and with no prospects (probably due
to a very spotty work history), he had nowhere else to go. His sister Sarah told us he tried to kill
himself, but we don't know the details, but we're taking Sarah's word for
it. Life goes on until it doesn't.
[[I
hope you’re coping okay and working through the pain. In my experience, there’s a certain amount of
pain and grief in everything, and the only way to lessen it is to actually work
through it. If you don’t, if you try to
avoid it, it will just wait for you. But, it is also important to recognize that there is no
“right” way to grieve. It is different
for every person, and different in every occasion for each person. I encourage you, and Jason for that matter,
to seek both professional and non-professional help if you feel it might be
necessary or helpful.
I’ve
got a few specific friends who are seriously contemplating suicide. There’s nothing I can say or do to stop them
or fix them or save them, which is someone I realized after my years with
Mara. But I do tell them two
things. First, they can feel free to
express those sentiments and emotions with me.
I will not attack them, I will listen without
judgment. Second, if I feel they are an
imminent danger to themselves, I WILL contact the authorities immediately. I
don’t care if they choose to never talk to me again as “punishment” for doing
so. It’s what I am going to do. I can’t save them, but I don’t have to be a
party to irreversible decisions they make in the midst of misery and
depression.]]
Mark
Nelson:
My computer still doesn't like your PDF...
I
went to see Dune last night, only the second movie I've seen this year. But
that equals last year's total and I'm hoping to see a couple more before the
end of the year. But probably not over the Xmas period. Yesterday was the last
day when masks were required, but I imagine that I will continue to wear one
going into the future. I think we're at about 93% double vaccination in NSW.
Let's call it 95%. That sounds very
high. But if instead you say that one in twenty people are not double
vaccinated, it now doesn't sound so good.
[[I
feel like, at this stage, it might be more helpful for the powers that be to
focus on testing and masks. Especially
as this new variant appears to easily infect even those who are fully
vaccinated and boosted (but those shots continue to offer reliable ability to
greatly lessen the severity of ny illness in nearly
all cases). I don’t want to get into a
political debate about any of this. But
the one thing that drives me nuts is people who wear masks but leave their noses
uncovered. There is no point in wearing
it if you won’t wear it properly (and yes, I know it provides only slight
protection from getting sick, but it clearly does help prevent transmission at
some level, and to me any level is worth it when it comes to me wearing a mask
when I’m in a store or the post office or the elevator at work).]]
Hahaha.
When I said I downloaded free PDFs of sheet music/music books I should have
clarified that although they were free to download
they weren't free because the authors had made them freely available. If you
know what i mean. Still, most of the things that I
download are no longer in print. And I do have a policy that if I download
something for "free" that I end up using then if it's in print then I
will buy a copy.
A
long time ago I went into one of the wife's "shops" and was surprised
to discover that they sold DVDs. Or
rather they had sold DVDs because they had evidently decided to sell off their
stock and get out of the DVD selling business. So for
$1 I was able to buy the Clark Gable-Doris Day vehicle "Teacher's
Pet". And that's AUD $1! I wasn't sure what to expect. But it was only AUD
$1!
Despite
having this video for a long time (maybe three years or so) we only got around
to watching it at the end of last week. Before we watched it the misses asked
if it was going to be in black and white, if it's in black and white she
instantly has a poor opinion of it. I saw that it was made in 1957 and said no,
so that was the first point of interest: it was in black and white. When did colour become standard?
[[Black
and white movies continued to be made well into the 60’s, usually for monetary
reasons but sometimes for atmosphere. I
believe 1961 or 1962 was the first year more than half the films released were
in color (just checked, it was 1961).]]
It
wasn't a bad movie. I wasn't surprised to realize that the phenomenon of
leading men being cast against much younger leading ladies (21
year gap between Gable and Day) was not of recent origin...Of course,
the technology and staffing of newspapers is very different to how it's
portrayed in the movie (which makes that interesting from a technological
perspective). When I was in junior school we went on a
class trip to visit one of the local newspapers (i
suppose I was ten at the time, circa 1978/1979) and I remember being shown the
typesetting of the newspaper and the plates used for printing photographic
images. (For many years I had two of the photographic plates as souvenirs). And
in the third decade of the 21st century the behaviour
of Clark Gable's character might lead him to facing a charge of sexual assault.
These are all considerations that made the movie more interesting to me. But
considering the story, my wife did laugh out loud at several points so some of
the humour is still funny just over sixty years after
it's released. Going back to meta issues. The argument as to whether journalism
can be learnt through tertiary education or only on the job has long been
decided in favour of education. Though I wonder to
what extent that's because making journalism a graduate level profession
removes all the costs of training from the media companies... That's a point on
which the Clark Gable character changes his mind during the movie.
[[The
cable network TCM has to deal with this kind of thing a lot: placing films in
context, including racism, blackface, sexual conduct, and physical violence
against women. They’ve chosen the best
approach, which is show the movie as intended, and then during the host
intro/outro make a mention of the things which at the time were “normal” but
now are clearly inappropriate. Films are
windows into the past, and you can’t pretend those attitudes never existed.]]
Just
looking through the games section. If I'd been playing By Almost Popular Demand I would have felt obliged to select Leeds as my UK
university. Incidentally, we don't have the same equivalence between university
and college as in the US. There are very few university
equivalent institutions which do not have university in their title - Imperial
College being the most well known.
[[For
all I know there is a difference here in the U.S. too. As I never went to college/university, I have
no clue. (I couldn’t afford it, loans
were mostly based on your parents’ income and my Dad
made too much money despite always being broke, and anyway I had to go get a
job so I could get Mara away form her family before
she killed herself. I often wish I’d
gone, but I don’t know if any degree I might have earned would be relevant
today.]]
However,
that wasn't the purpose of this PS. No.
A few days I was flicking through the channels and one of them was showing King
Arthur (2004). I've seen the end of this, but never watched it from start to
finish. I was wondering if you might ask iin "By
Almost Popular Demand" which is the best movie based on King Arthur... My favourite is Excaliber
(perhaps because of the portrayal of Merlin), which is on my list of movies to
buy but I've not seen it anywhere. If
you decide not to ask it, perhaps you could write something about your favourite King Arthur movies? Not sure that I have a second favourite.
[[Excaliber has always been my favorite, in part because it
was the first Arthurian film I was introduced to that
I paid attention to while watching. And
yes, I love the depiction of Merlin.
Sarcastic, snarky, and of course (in the end) fallible. There really aren’t that many other great
Arthurian films. I enjoyed The Mists of
Avalon, which focuses on the women in the stories, but that was because I read
the book while in prison. I was never a
huge fan of the musical Camelot. Merlin,
starring Sam Neill, was worth watching.
I recall I found the Connery/Gere film First Knight a bit silly. I suppose the second-best Arthurian film
remains Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail, even if the historian
is brutally murdered.]]
Richard
Smith: Most
web hosting plans give you https at no extra cost these days.
Having
said that I have quite an old deal on my hosting and the variablepig.org domain
name, the latter will cost me a bit more that the current £8 a year I pay when
it expires (not that there's much competition for it).
As
for font sizes - we recently upped the font sizes used in the Pig but this was
for the benefit of the printed version (which is done as an A5 booklet) and
readers' ageing eyeballs. As you say PDFs and HTML pages can easily be zoomed
on large screen devices, and HTML pages can use @media CSS or other techniques
to be more usable on a smartphone.
[[I’m
behind the curve in everything. It
wasn’t until perhaps two years ago that I learned I could host multiple domains
on one hosting account. Godaddy charges for https, and that’s who I have used for a
long time. In an amazing coincidence,
just after I typed that sentence my cell phone alerted me to a new charge from Godaddy on my credit card – autorenewal of one of my
domains.]]
Andy
York: Hope
your Christmas and New Year's went quietly, as mine did. Living alone, just not
a lot of reason to decorate or some of the other activities that really are
spent with others. I did make a nice Christmas dinner for myself and a batch of
Black-Eyed Peas on the 1st. Both turned out well and worth the time.
Regarding
the commentary in the LOC Column, instead of writing an autobiography why not
write it as fiction. Change the names, locations, etc. - enough to obscure
which of your siblings was the source of the events described. It might not be
doable, but it is a possibility.
[[Yeah,
alone there’s not much point to a tree or anything like that. Although if I planned far enough in advance,
I could almost see me doing it to feel a little festive. I also cooked on Christmas, making a
tenderloin roast and hasselback potatoes. The roast was way bigger than I needed, but
the only one available. Sanka loved it but couldn’t keep it down for whatever
reason – poultry works much better for her – so she didn’t get to share aside
from some butter. The neighborhood ferals got whatever leftovers I didn’t eat. Nom nom nom.
A
novel might be an idea, although it does kind of take a lot of the fun out of
it from the reader’s side. A lot of the
stories are crazy enough to be amazing when you know they actually happened,
but I am not sure it makes them as interesting if they’re figments of my
imagination. Still, it’s a thought!]]
The Dining Dead – Eternal Sunshine Movie
Reviews
Honeydew
(Shudder)
– I was searching on the internet for obscure recent movies, and this one
caught my attention. Okay, mostly it was
just that the other movies mentioned weren’t available for streaming yet
without a rental fee. This film is a
tremendously slow burn, nearly all atmosphere and very little plot
movement. A bickering couple out for a
camping trip (Malin Barr and Sawyer Spielberg – son
of Stephen Spielberg) develop car trouble and wander up to a farmhouse to ask
to use the phone to call for help. From
there it’s mostly weirdness for weirdness sake before
you arrive at the not-as-original-as-it-thinks reveal. I suppose this is a bit more of a suspense
movie than any kind of typical horror movie.
All of the acting is tolerable or better, with Barbara Kingsley the
standout as Karen, the matron of the farmhouse.
There are certainly many, many worse movies out there, but aside from
atmosphere there isn’t a lot in Honeydew to result in a recommendation. I watched until the end, mostly because I had
nothing else to do and the film stayed on the good side of “is this good enough
to at least not turn it off?” line.
Don’t
Look Up
(Netflix) – A fellow fan of SCTV (look it up if you don’t know) urged me to
watch this movie, telling me it was full of SCTV-type humor. I watched the trailer; I didn’t laugh
once. He told me I was being unfair to
judge the movie by the trailer. Fine…I
watched the first 30 minutes. I didn’t
laugh once. Eventually I went back two
more times until I’d fought through the whole two hours and twelve
minutes. The last five minutes of the
film were the best five minutes. This
movie has drawn comparisons to Dr. Strangelove and Wag the Dog
for its “brilliant satire of politics and the media.” I see potential, but there are two major
issues. The first is casting. It’s filled to the brim with big stars like
Leonardo DiCaprio, Jennifer Lawrence, Meryl Streep, Jonah Hill, and even Ariana
Grande. But none of them feel like good
fits for the characters. In fact, I felt
as if this was a SNL skit stretched into over two hours, in part because the
actors do not lend any authenticity to their roles; Streep is Streep playing a
role, not the character, and the same goes for the other big names. Just like when you watch SNL and see Belushi
as Belushi playing a role. The short
version of the plot is a graduate student and her professor (Lawrence and
DiCaprio) discover a previously-unknown comet heading towards Earth. In six months, all life on the planet will be
destroyed. Yet, when they present this
information to the President and her Chief of Staff (Streep and Hill), they
don’t seem to grasp the reality of the situation, and soon they’re thrown into
the world of television news and social media.
Aside from the casting, the direction is the major flaw. The situation is comical and dark, but the
result is neither funny nor tragic. It
takes itself far too seriously, and the jokes miss the target mainly by the way
they’re executed. Granted, I thought
both Anchorman movies (the films writer/director Adam McKay is best
known for) were unfunny, so it could just be personal taste. It just seemed like either things
in a comedy should actually be funny, or the whole thing should feel like a
surreal nightmare. Or both. Take films like After Hours and Miracle
Mile. Those work. This…doesn’t.
But at the same time, I can see that the ideas for each joke had merit;
they’re just not presented in the proper way.
[[Minor spoiler alert: when Lawrence and DiCaprio go to see the
President, a Marine General gives them some snacks and water but asks for cash
to reimburse the cost. Later they
discover the snacks were free. That kind
of thing should have been right at home in After Hours, but here it’s
neither funny nor surreal. They have a
funny idea and think that’s enough. It
isn’t. Not to mention in the real world
they’d NEVER go see the President personally]]. I should add, some people are treating this
film as an allegory to the lack of action on climate change, and because of
that, some who watch (or claim to watch) are basing their opinions on the film
solely on what side of that argument they fall on. This path didn’t even occur to me until I
discussed the movie with someone on Facebook days later. Like it or hate it, please judge the film on
its merits. As for me, my opinion: it
has a lot of good ideas, and aims at a lot of worthy targets along the
way. But it just…isn’t…funny.
Older
Movies Watched (that I’ve seen many times) – Breaker Morant, Better Off Dead,
March of the Wooden Soldiers. It’s a Wonderful Life, Scrooge, Silent Night
Deadly Night, Silent Night Bloody Night, The Godfather.
NOT TONIGHT, DEAR,
I HAVE A DEADLINE
Whether you want it or not, this is it. A subzine by the oldest geezer still roaming the plains (or more often, the kitchen): Conrad Friesner von Metzke, that be I, one of the very last of the old warhorses in this hobby, coming back to the corral for another go-round with whoever’s bothering to read this. Messages can be sent via Doug or directly to vonmetzke@outlook.com . Whether or not anybody has a message to send, well, now that’s another matter indeed.
There was once a faction of the postal Dip hobby unofficially called the Old Guard, or some equivalent, and as years went by, this group’s diminishing membership was obvious from every compilation, to the extent that I may well be the only one left on the list. That could simply mean I’m out of touch. Or perhaps I’m too old for my own good. Regardless, if there are any others out there who were in on this hobby from its outset, please raise your hands.
(He studies the crowd carefully.)
Well, golly gee whiz, I sure don’t see very many hands raised, do you? Maybe they’re mostly too old to travel? Or maybe they mostly finally grew up?
The reason for this subzine (or “guest column with individual title”) is that I’m lonely. I mean, sure, I have a wife and two sons and two dogs and about thirty fish, but what fun are they? Not a single one of them knows anything about convoying armies, or about laughing at people who try convoying but screw it up. So leave it to me to step in and straighten things out, all the while neglecting everything going on around me, like Peanut the pup trying to pee on my shoe….oh dear, I think maybe I should have looked sooner….
I have absolutely no formal idea what I’m going to do with this drivel, but I’m going to try and make it Fun. Fun for me to do, and fun for you to read. Not silly fun; I’ve done too much of that already in one lifetime. Fun in the sense that this postal gaming hobby really ought to be about something more than just playing and winning games, more than just cooking up a new maneuver designed to outfox even the best of the opposition currently in the hobby….
...because if all we do is write Army Budapest to Romania and then sit back and chuckle at our own brilliance (or gag at our own ineptitude when the enemy roars right back at you), then this isn’t a game any longer. Remember that little word FUN. It can be mixed in with lots of other words we come across a lot – Brilliant, Stunning, Stupid, Never Again in This Lifetime Will I Trust That Creep Again - but it seems to me that if it isn’t Fun, at least most of the time, then you need a different hobby.
My aim with this subzine, whether serious or silly, will be to focus on the fun – and WHY it can be fun, and HOW it can be fun, and the best ways to make sure it’s NOT fun for that poor sap you just ground into the dust….
Er. Well, we’ll work on it. ...
Octopus's Garden
Issue
One Hundred and Three
5th January 2022
Sub-editorial
HELLO,
good evening and welcome to Octopus's Garden, the subzeen
with its very own Railway Rivals game. It is a subzeen
to Douglas Kent's Eternal Sunshine.
It's produced by Peter Sullivan peter@burdonvale.co.uk.
It's also available on the web at: http://www.burdonvale.co.uk/octopus/.
Round 12 (RR 2473 B) — "Garrett Hobart" — Railway Rivals
Map "B" (Lon&Lpl)
JGL black (John David Galt); AYUP yellow (Mark Firth); HJA red (Hank Alme); BASH sky-blue (Bob Blanchett).
Company |
B/fwd |
36 |
37 |
38 |
39 |
40 |
41 |
42 |
C/fwd |
JGL |
409 |
20 |
20 |
12 |
|
|
20 |
1 |
482 |
AYUP |
389 |
|
|
16 |
10 |
20 |
|
19 |
454 |
HJA |
221 |
10 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
|
10 |
272 |
BASH |
165 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
10 |
|
176 |
Totals |
1184 |
30 |
20 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
1384 |
Congratulations to John David and thanks to the rest of you for
playing. Any end game statements to me, Peter Sullivan, at peter@burdonvale.co.uk
by WEDNESDAY, 9th FEBRUARY 2022.
That was Octopus's Garden #103,
Startling Press production number 399.
Out of the WAY #40
by W. Andrew York
(wandrew88 of gmail.com)
Howdy!
The
Happiest of New Years to all of you for 2022. Let’s hope this year is an
improvement over the last two. I’m eagerly waiting on the start of baseball
season, presuming both sides are able to agree on a contract in the near
future. I also hope to get out a bit more, do some visiting, watch more movies
and such. Not that I can’t keep myself busy at home with reading, writing,
cooking, going through boxes/bins (way too many of those) and such.
For
the column, I’ve added a couple things back. You’ll find mini-book reviews from
the past few months – I think I included all of them, but I’ve a nagging
feeling I missed one. I didn’t complete as many as I’d hope for in that last
quarter, mostly only keeping up on the “annual reads” and magazines (for the
most part). I did end up with a count of 55 books for the year, likely my
highest number ever!
Also,
I’ve included two recipes, though they aren’t formal recipes. One is an altered
recipe from a cookbook (source referenced) that I ended up using for my
Christmas dinner. I thought I’d picked up a package of lamb chops only to
discover on that day that they were lamb SHOULDER chops – the difference is
that shoulder chops are tougher and need to be cooked differently (braising
versus pan roasting). So, though I’d planned an easy/simple prep (boxed
stuffing, using turkey stock in place of water, and wilted spinach with onions
and mushrooms (see OOTW #23 for the basic recipe)), I had to add the braising.
I found a good recipe for Lamb Chops with Red Wine and Pearl Onions and
modified to what I had on hand (a dusty bottle of red wine, not sure it was
truly dry, and diced onions for the pearl onions).
It
actually didn’t add that much time, the active time in cooking was only 15 or
so minutes versus 7-8 minutes for the pan roast. In the end, the braising made
a much tastier dinner overall, well worth the extra time and effort. Plus, it
looked like I’d spent a lot of time, instead of the 20ish minutes I actually
did spend. I must confess, I did take a picture of the plate to share with a
couple of friends. If you’d like to see it, drop me an email and I’ll send it
to you.
The
other is Scratch Black Eyed Peas (see OOTW #3 for a
more formal recipe). I’d completely forgotten about them until a friend
mentioned that he was soaking his peas for the next day. I zipped out and grabbed
a carton of fresh peas so I wouldn’t have to soak them with such a short time
remaining (costs much more, but saves time when you’re in a rush). The rest is
mostly a dump of what I already had on hand – diced veggies (no green peppers),
opened package of diced ham, what remained of a bag of spinach, the leftover
turkey stock from Christmas, etc. So,
that one is more of a framework than a recipe with precise measurements. It
turned out quite well, enjoyed it for a few days.
Further
down the column, the Hangman word was guessed. The ongoing commentary,
previously redacted, shows some of the players’ thoughts and guesses at the
definition. Some were pretty spot on in their conclusions! The Gunboat game has
a split season and in Facts in Five, I believe, the first time a max 50 points
was scored for a single category. A new Hangman will start next issue and you
can always jump in the Facts in Five game. Any interest in a Black Press
Gunboat game? I think I now have regained my GMing
sea legs that I’m ready to add another Dip game to the mix. If not Black Press
Gunboat, any other suggestions that you’re interested in trying?
In
other news, a friend bought me a year’s membership to SABR (baseball
aficionado/historical/statistical group). There is a local chapter and my first
meeting is on the 8th. Due to Omicron, it’ll be on Zoom instead of
the originally planned in-person event. Speakers include chapter members, Tal
Smith (baseball executive with the Red, Yankees and Colt .45s) and Perry Barber
(female baseball umpire including some MLB exhibition games), plus the Round
Rock Express General Manager – Tim Jackson, and their Director of Broadcasting
and radio voice - Mike Capps, that I both know. The group is also having mock
Hall of Fame balloting. Looking forward to a few hours of baseball in the midst
of winter.
Not
much else new around here, though I did attend the local Mensa Christmas
gathering one evening for dinner and conversation – my only real holiday event.
I did see a few movies:
Vertigo
– first time seeing it, pretty engaging though it shows its age in the
“special” effects
Licorice
Pizza – fun, humorous, light-hearted. Worth seeing
The
Tender Bar – decent story, good acting
Don’t
Look Up – much better than I expected, sharp parody with lots of laughs
Remember
the Night – I’m a Stanwyck fan, but this was a confusing mess of a script. From
what I understand, the
original script, by Preston
Sturges – an excellent writer, was pared from 3 hours to about 1.5 hours which
resulted in this subpar movie.
The acting was top-notch (including Fred MacMurray) but it couldn’t overcome
the script’s limitations.
It just came to mind that,
alongside the Mini-Book Reviews, I could do Mini-Movie Reviews. I’d limit it to
those I see in a theater as those on TV are often badly cut and, when I watch
DVDs, I’m usually multi-tasking and not paying sufficient attention to it so a
review beyond a simple thumbs up/down would be unfair. Any interest?
I, again, wish everyone an Amazing 2022! Keep warm
this winter, be safe and well!
ANN RICHARDS QUOTE #10
“If you think
taking care of yourself is selfish, change your mind. If you don’t, you’re
simply ducking your
responsibilities.”
Sources: www.inspiringquotes.us/author/3002-ann-richards
===================================
(always welcome,
send them in!)
(if something
shouldn’t be included here, clearly mark it as a personal comment)
[Andy Lischett] – Mark Nelson mentioned a home with a 10-car garage.
My dream house! Between us Carol and I have six
cars and I’d probably fill the rest of the garage
within a year. Then I’d have to build a shed for a lawnmower and other
yard junk.
[Mark Nelson]
– Your Ann Richards quote reminded me (I don’t know why) of the following quote
from Galaxy Quest: ‘Never
give up, never surrender”. I have sometimes used that
quote when teaching engineering students with regard to the final
exam. (They should know how to do all the questions
on the exam paper because they’ve seen them all before. So
if
they see a question and don’t know how to do it…). [WAY] – back when I was finishing my BA
is History, I had a
professor that had a similar philosophy – every
question on the (multiple choice) final he’d already used and all
questions had been discussed after those tests (the
class was a basic Western Civ for Freshmen). Even so, I recall him
lamenting at the end of a term that a question, used
multiple times previously, still had about 25% of the students, on the
final, identifying a Phalanx as the Petrified Finger
of Buddha.
[MN] - I
have never ever mashed potatoes using anything other than a hand
held masher. (The potato masher is
sometimes deployed for mashing other things such as
stewed fruit). I’ve sometimes thought about buying a potato ricer
since many people say that’s how you get the best mashed
potatoes. However, that’s another piece of cooking
equipment to store and I’m not sure how many times I
would use it, so I live with the imperfection of mashing my
potatoes by hand. [WAY] – Ok, I was wrong last issue, I could also mash potatoes with
a Ricer. I do have one, just in a
bin that hasn’t been unpacked so it didn’t come to
mind. They are a bit unwieldly to store, but the silkiness of the
potatoes pressed through them is worth the effort for
company. That said, since now I mostly cook only for myself, I
don’t really have a reason to put in the extra work
just for the mouth-feel.
===================================
(finished since September)
Beacon Hunters by Deb Grant, Lisa Hoelscher
and Travis Meier (2021; 108p).
This is a collection of poems, observations and
musings by Deb Grant (she calls them Field Notes) and two of her protégés. Each
selection is one to three pages and provides a quick break (reading one per
day) to the day’s routine to stop, read and reflect on the given piece. I found
them to give interesting perspectives, stir a memory or otherwise something to
ponder about. Recommended. [September 2021]
Guards! Guards! by Terry Pratchett (1989; 403p).
The next volume in the DiscWorld
series turns back to Ankh-Morpork and looks into the
City Guards – not as set pieces in a story about the rulers or itinerant
adventurers but from their actual perspective. Here, this group is routinely
put aside and is almost without a job due to a unique arrangement between the
criminal class and the citizenry.
To that add a power hungry
magician-wannabe with a newly arrived, back-country, teenager with visions of
the City Guard the way it used to be and you end up with another enjoyable Pratchett
tale. There are unexpected turns, the usual look at things from a 90-degree
angle offset and a number of new (or more fleshed out) characters to follow.
The opening bit has a hilarious bit larking secret societies and their penchant
for code names, passwords and ritual.
I wouldn’t say this was my favorite of the series, so
far. But, did find much of the circumstances and plot twists to keep my
interest and attention. Recommended. [November 2021]
God’s Purpose by Charles F. Stanley (2020; 383p).
This is a collection of 365 daily devotions collected
and produced by Stanley’s In Touch Ministries. The
format follows the usual structure of a bible verse, a one-page discourse
discussing the passage and a closing prayer. Most of the devotions were
stand-alone, but several built on the previous days’ pages.
Worth reading if it is a topic of interest. [December
2021]
The Maxwell Leadership
Bible notes and articles by John C.
Maxwell (2002; 1616p).
This Bible uses the New King James translation for
the biblical text. In addition there are copious
footnotes pointing out differences in wording from other translations and
texts.
The additional material draws observations and
examples, both good and bad, of Leadership from the biblical personages. Those
are compiled into an opening piece before each book that gives some historical
context to the book, lists leadership examples, identify the leaders and bullet
points the leadership lessons. Scattered throughout the book are short (up to
one-page) discussions of the identified leadership lessons in both secular and
religious contexts.
Overall, it provides a solid roadmap on being an
effective leader, what to avoid, how to relate to others and strategies to
improve your future. Well worth considering, if you are interested in
leadership training in the biblical context. [December 2021]
The New Being by Paul Tillich (1955; 179p).
Paul Tillich was a German theologian that was
“requested” to leave Germany early in the rise of Nazism. Ending up in New
England, he published an initial book, The Shaking of the Foundations,
(I have yet to read) and this is a collection of sermons he gave to answer
questions he presented in his first book.
The 23 sermons are divided into three sections:
-
The New Being as
Love
-
The New Being as
Freedom
-
The New Being as
Fulfillment
Most
of the sermons are 10-pages or less, many under 5. A few are longer. Most open
with one or more biblical
passages followed by the
sermon text. Each dives into an aspect of the
section’s theme providing fresh perspectives and points to mull over, at least
for me. Sometimes a sermon becomes a bit opaque, but usually by the end the
purpose is clear. As a side note, several times his writing is obviously
influenced by his experiences in Germany and the shadow of Fascism.
I read this at a pace of one sermon per week, giving
me time to think and ponder what was presented. Overall, I learned some things,
had my viewpoint expanded and enjoyed the presentations. Recommended. [November
2021]
wellspring simple by Deb Grant (2021; 93p).
Her latest collection of writings (called pocket
essays in this volume) is drawn from two Email series she wrote in 2021 and
distributed through her ELogos mailing list. The
first series was written under the theme “Well of an August Spring” (aka WellSpring) as a 23-day exercise based on whatever had her
attention that day. Some of the topics included musing on a travel memory, on
scarcity in today’s world and on uncertainty in life.
The second series is based on the theme of Simple
Gifts. As I recall, over the course of a couple months, she wrote fifteen
pieces when she identified something that fit the theme. Titles included Hands,
Indoor Plumbing and Acorn Day.
As with most of what she’s written, I approached the
book with one pocket essay a day. Even though I’d read the source Emails some time ago, each seemed fresh and each sparked a
smile, chuckle and/or a pointed thought. Highly recommended. [December 2021]
Annual
Reads Previously Reviewed: Daily Guideposts 2021 (previous year’s
editions reviewed) [December 2021]; The Father
Christmas Letters
by J.R.R. Tolkien [December 2021]
===================================
In
“Dust to Dust” – Lennier: “A darkness carried in the
heart cannot be cured by moving the body from one place to another.”
Source: But In Purple...I’m Stunning!
by J. Michael Straczynski, edited by Sara “Samm” Barnes, copyright 2008.
===================================
Recipe Philosophy: Except for
baking, recipes are only suggestions. I rarely precisely measure, eyeballing
most everything. The
listed measurements, for the most part, are estimates
from the last time I made the recipe. Feel free to adjust to meet
your personal tastes – and remember, it is easier to
add “more” of something than to compensate when “too much” has
been added.
For ingredients, if you don’t
like raw onions, omit them or replace with celery to retain the crunchiness. If
you like food with
more spice, add an extra jalapeno or use habaneros
instead. On the other hand, if you don’t like spicy food, replace the
jalapeno with a bell pepper. Optional items are used
when I’m looking for a variation or making it for individuals
with specific preferences or allergies.
[[for background on these two recipes, see opening
piece]]
Lamb Shoulder Chops with Onions and Red Wine
(based on Lamb Chops with
Pearl Onions and Red Wine, page 460)
(in The Complete Meat
Cookbook by Bruce Aidells and Denis Kelly)
Ingredients
2 Lamb
Shoulder Chops (sauce below is measured for 2 lbs of
lamb chops as in the original recipe)
1 tbsp Grapeseed
Oil
½ c Dry
Red Wine
½ c Turkey
Stock
2 tbsps Balsamic Vinegar
¼ Large
Sweet Onion, Diced
Salt and Pepper
Steps
1. Salt and pepper both sides of the chops
2. Heat oil in a high sided skillet over medium-high heat
3. Once hot, brown the chops for 2-3 minutes on each
side, remove and set aside (no need to tent)
4. Pour off any grease from the pan, then add the wine,
stock and vinegar
5. Bring to a boil scraping any bits that may have stuck
to the pan while browning the chops
6. Add onion, stir in, then add chops back in
7. Reduce heat to a simmer and cover pan
8. Let cook until chops are tender, roughly 30-35 minutes
shaking occasionally to stir the contents
9. Remove chops and tent
10. Skim off any grease (I didn’t have any noticeable
amount) and reduce the liquid under high heat until syrupy
11. Taste for salt and pepper, then plate the chops
pouring the sauce over each
Scratch Black-Eyed Peas
Ingredients
1 ctn Fresh Black-Eyed Peas (11oz container)
2 lugs Grapeseed
Oil
¼ Large
Sweet Onion, Diced
2 Large
Jalapenos, Diced
½ Head
of Garlic, peeled and rough chopped
Remainder of Fresh Spinach in the bag
2 Handfuls
of Diced Ham
Remaining Turkey Stock in carton
Cholula Hot Sauce
Steps
1. Prepare black-eyed peas per the container (as I
recall, simmer in water for 20 minutes, drain)
2. Heat oil in pan, add onions and jalapenos, cook until
soft and beginning to brown
3. Add Garlic, cook briefly
4. Add spinach in batches until wilted
5. Add turkey stock and ham, heat through
6. Turn off heat, stir in beans
7. Serve with Cholula for extra heat
===================================
Everyone Plays Games: Hangman,
By Definition; Facts in Five
Game Openings: Breaking Away
(Kent, Burgess, Smith; Firth, minimum 6 players needed)
Standard
Choice (Smith, minimum 4 players needed)
Possible Game Openings:
Breaking Away Variants, Grey-Press Gunboat (no preference lists)
Suggestions
accepted for other games to offer.
Standbys: Breaking Away (x1);
Gunboat Diplomacy (x1)
Rules for Breaking Away.
Breaking Away Variants and Choice available on the Variable Pig website
(variablepig.org)
+++++++++++++++++++++
“Round Rock Express”
(No-Press Gunboat, Game #1)
MN: 2021Crb32
Two requests for a season separation were received.
Orders on file will be used for Spring 1903 unless amended.
Autumn 1902
France
retreats a bur-BEL
Winter 1902
Austria
builds A Vie; has F GRE, A BUL, A TRI, A BUD, A GAL, A VIE
England
has F NWY, F GAS, A PIC, F MAO, A LPL
France
builds A Par, A Mar; has F NWG, A SPA, A BEL, A PAR, A MAR
Germany builds A Ber, A Kie; has F SWE, A BUR, A MUN, A WAR, F DEN, A BER, A KIE
Italy has F EME, A TUN, A VEN, F ION
Russia has F BAL, F RUM, A
UKR, A BOH
Turkey has A SMY, F CON, F
AEG
Supply Center Count
Austria: Bud, Tri, Vie, Ser, Gre, Bul =
6
England: Edi, Lpl, Lon, Bre, Nwy =
5
France: Mar, Par, Por, Spa,
Bel =
5
Germany: Ber, Kie, Mun, Den, Hol, Swe, War =
7
Italy: Nap, Rom, Ven, Tun =
4
Russia: Mos, StP, Sev, Rum =
4
Turkey: Ank,
Con, Smy =
3
Neutral: none
Next Due Spring 1903
Note – Split seasons are
granted when 2 or more requests are received if 4+ players; 3 or less requires
only 1.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Hangman, By Definition
This is a five
round game, with each round consisting of a variable number of turns.
The winner will be the person who wins the most rounds, with a tie breaker
being fewest total number of turns in those winning rounds. Second tie breaker
will be the most number of letters guessed (by total
count revealed, not by individual letter).
Each round will consist of
identifying a word of at least six letters. Along with each word will be the
first definition given. All words and definitions will be identified by blank
spaces. Words and definitions are verified in a dictionary that was my high
school graduation gift (slight hint to those who might want to find the
edition).
The goal is to guess the word
in as few turns as possible. Each turn, all players will submit one letter to
be revealed. The letter submitted by the most players will be the letter
revealed in the next turn. Ties will be broken by a randomized method.
Additionally, each player should submit a guess for the word. Once the word is
correctly identified (spelling is important), that round will end and a new
round will begin. All players who guess the word in the same turn will share in
the win for the round. If the word is not guessed by the end of six turns with
no letter being revealed, no one will win the round.
Along with revealing letters
in the word, letters will be revealed in the definition. There are no bonus
points for guessing any part of the definition, it is only there to help
players figure out the word. No guesses about parts of the definition will be confirmed
or displayed except by the letter revealed in that round. The letters “E” and
“S” can never be chosen as the letter to be revealed.
Game 1, Round Four, Turn 5:
Letter Votes: G – 1; N – 1; O – 1; P – 1; W - 1; Y –
1 Revealed: All
Words Guessed: (Firth)
Region; (Kent) Region; (Lischett) Region; (Maslen)
Region; (O’Hara) Racial;
(Smith) Region; (Wilson) Rimose
Solution:
Word: Region (6)
Definition: Any (3) large (5), usually (7)
continuous (10) segment (7) of (2) a (1) surface (7) or (2) space (5);
an
(2) area (4)
Never Revealed: E,
S Already
Revealed: A, L, R, T, Z
Game Words Correctly Guessed: Infinitesimal
(David-Gardner, Firth, Kent, Smith, Wilson);
Triclinium (Firth, Maslen, Smith, Wilson)
Chummy (Wilson)
Region (Firth, Kent, Lischett,
Maslen, Smith)
Player
Comments:
[Andy Lischett] – Is the gap <in last issue’s game report>
between “LA” and the rest of the second word of the definition
intentional – like La Scala – or a computer glitch or
something? [WAY] – I neglected to
remove the space when
revealing the letters. The best way to delineate
words is by using the letter counts at the end of each word. That should
remove any confusion about spacing.
In
last issue it was shown as “…(3) LA R
__ __ (5)…”. Showing the previous word was three letters and the next
word
was five. If it was akin to La Scala, it would have been sown as “…(3) LA (2) R __ __ (3)”. Hope that clears up any ambiguity.
[AL] –
Also, have you considered listing past guesses so that players don’t duplicate
a word? I could write a list and add
to it each month, but it would get lost. [WAY] – excellent suggestion that I’ll
add in the future (assuming I don’t
forget in the interim).
Redacted Comments from
Previous Rounds -
Turn 2
[Kevin Wilson]
– Still not near enough to narrow things down much except that 3rd
word in the definition but still too much
there too so just another shot in the dark.
Turn 3
[Richard Smith]
– Not a lot of letters visible but the clue could be something like “lives
morally”.
[Kevin Wilson] – Forgot about nominating vowels! Thought about Y
with that 3rd word in the definition probably ending
“LLY”. Maybe next time.
[Mark Firth] – Solution: Red lemur, usually containing product of
a mollusk in brine; no hope.
Turn 4
[Mark Firth]
– (Definition Guess)
ANY LARGE, USUALLY PROTRUDING SEGMENT
OF A RIBCAGE OR WHARF;
AN AREA
[Richard Smith]
– I have a guess at “ISOGON” for the word. This is based on “equally” and “an
area” possibly being in the
clue.
[Dane Maslen]
– Currently I’m working on the assumption that the definition is along the lines:
Any LA__, usuALLy
___T___ing ______T in/on A
____A__ __ __A__; An AreA
[Andy Lischett] – ANY laRGE, ---allY CONTIGUOUS -----t IN a ----a—OR –a--; aS aSIa. Wild guesses. May the
last two
words are “an area.”
Turn 5
[Kevin Wilson]
– I really thought I could figure out the word with the info available.
6-letters without ALTZ did limit the
universe and a few of the words in the definition
seem clear but I still didn’t come to conclusion. I won’t be surprised if
someone gets it this time and I just missed it. And,
at the risk of really being sad, my second choice was Roughy.
[Mark Firth]
– Any large, usually […] segment of a surface or space; an area.
[Richard Smith]
– This <word guess> is based on “any large equally” and “an area”
possibly being in the clue.
[Andy Lischett] – “Any large, ---all- continuous segment of a ---r-a-- or place; an area.”
[Dane Maslen]
– I suspect the definition is “Any LARge, usuALLy contiguous subunit of A surface oR
shApe; An AReA”
+++++++++++++++++++++
FACTS
IN FIVE
Rules: There will be five rounds, the cumulative high
score at the end of the fifth round will be the winner. Anyone may join anytime
with a starting score matching the lowest total from the previous round. Anyone
missing a round will add the lowest score of that round.
Each round will consist of five categories and five
letters. Each player submit may an entry
for each category which has a key word that starts with each of the letters
(twenty-five total entries). Key words are generally the first word; however articles (the, a, etc.) and modifiers (“red” in red
bicycle for “R” in “mode of transportation” or “general” in General Lee for “G”
in “Military Leaders”) are not key words. A word in the category may not be the
key word (“bank” in “Bank of America” for “B” in the category “Banks”). For given
names, the last name is the key word, if married it will be their post-marriage
last name. However, in the case of commonly used stage names, that name should
be used (in a category of female singers, ”Q” could be
“Queen Latifa” and “Cher” for “C”). An entry may only be used once per round. Please
clearly identify which individual you are using as your answer if there are
multiple potential people with a given name. For instance, if the category is
American Presidents, answering Washington is fine as there is only one;
however, if you decided to use Bush you need to indicate whether you are
submitting the father or the son. Unclear answers will be matched to score the
least points. Using the Bush example, if one person submitted “Bush” and three
people submit “George W. Bush” the latter would score 2 points and the former
1.
One point will be scored for each entry that
unarguably meets the letter and category. An additional point will be added if
anyone else also uses the same valid entry for the same category. Maximum
possible score in a round is 50 with a lowest possible score of 25, presuming
an individual submits a valid entry for each category and letter in that round.
Research is allowed, collaboration between players is
not.
Game Four, Round One
Bolded - Scores 2 points for matching another entry; Crossed
Out - scores 0 points; otherwise scores 1 point.
REMINDER - Last names are generally the key word, not first
names.
Players D H O
S V
US National Park Name
Mark Firth Death Valley Hot Springs Olympic Shenandoah Virgin Islands
Doug Kent Death Valley Hot Springs Olympic Sequoia Voyageurs
Andy Lischett Denali Hot Springs Olympic Shenandoah Virgin Islands
Walt O’Hara Denali Hot Springs Olympic Shenandoah Virgin Islands
Kevin Wilson Death
Valley Hot Springs Olympic Sequoia Voyageurs
Restaurant Chains (5+
storefronts across at least 2 cities)
Mark Firth Domino’s
Pizza Hard Rock Café Outback Steakhouse Subway Veeno
Doug Kent Denny’s Hooters Olive Garden Starbucks Venezia
Andy Lischett Denny’s Howard
Johnsons Outback Steakhouse Steak ‘n
Shake Vapiano
Walt O’Hara Dairy
Queen Hard Rock Café Olive Garden Sbarros Vocelli Pizza
Kevin Wilson Denny’s Hooters Outback Steakhouse Subway Village Inn
Famous Military Leader
Mark Firth Dayan,
M Hannibal Osman I Sherman,
WT Vespasian
Doug Kent King David Hannibal Osterhaus Spartacus Veatch
Andy Lischett DeGaulle Hannibal Otto I Bedell
Smith Werner Voss
Walt O’Hara De
Trobriand Hardee Ord Stuart Von Steinwehr
Kevin Wilson Sir Francis Drake Hannibal Osman I Spartacus Vo
Nguyen Giap
Title of Poem by non-US Poet
Mark Firth Dover Beach Hadramauti Ode..Nightingale Sonnet 18:… Vitai Lampada
Doug Kent Do Not Go… Hombres… Ozymandius Should Lanterns… Vengeance is Not
Mine
Andy Lischett Do Not Go… Hope Old Grey Squirrel Sick
Rose Variations on the Word Love
Walt O’Hara Don’t
Go Far… Hayeswater Obermann Once.. Saddest Poem Voice, The
Kevin Wilson Dover Beach Horatius… Ozymandius Second Coming Variations on the Word Love
Female BAFTA Award Winner
Mark Firth Faye
Dunaway Audrey Hepburn Valli O’Reilly Barbra Streisand Lesley Vanderwalt
Doug Kent Judi Dench Audrey Hepburn Diana
Ossana Maggie Smith <<>>
Andy Lischett Judy Davis A Hepburn <<>> Maggie Smith <<>>
Walt O’Hara Judy Davis Katherine Hepburn <<see below>> Emma Stone <<see
below>>
Kevin Wilson Judi Dench Audrey
Hepburn Valli O’Reilly Maggie Smith Lesley Vanderwalt
Note – for allowed and disallowed
answers, please feel free to correct me!
Notes on Mark’s Answers: Dover Beach is by Arnold; Hadramauti
is by Kipling; Ode..Nightingale
is Ode to a Nightingale by
Keats; Sonnet 18:… is Sonnet
18: Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day? By Shakespeare; Vitai
Lampada is by
Newbolt; Valli O’Reilly was for Make-up in 2010; Lesley Vanderwalt
was for Make-up in 2015
Notes on Doug’s Answers: Do Not Go… is Do Not Go Gently Into
That Good Night; Hombres… is Hombres necios que
acusais; Should Lanterns…
is Should Lanterns Shine; Vengeance is Not Mine is disallowed as I couldn’t
find a poem
by that name, please provide a reference.
Notes on Andy’s Answers: Howard Johnson’s is
accepted as, though they don’t currently meet the requirements, they did at one
time and the category did
not specify “current”; Do Not Go… is Do Not Go Gently Into
That Good Night
Notes on Walt’s Answers: De Trobriand is Phillipe Regis De Trobriand (Union
Army, ACW); Hardee is William Joseph Hardee (CSA
Army, ACW); Ord is Edward Otho Ord (Union Army, ACW); Stuart is James Ewell
Brown “Jeb” Stuart (CSA
Army, ACW); Von Steinwehr
is Adolph Wilhelm Von Seinwehr
(Union Army, ACW); Don’t Go Far… is Don’t Go
Far Off, Not Even for a Day - Pablo Neruda, Chile; Hayeswater
is by Matthew Arnold, England; Obermann
Once.. is OBermann Once More by Matthew Arnold, England; Saddest Poem
is by Pablo Neruda, Chile; Voice, The is
by Matthew Arnold, England; “O There IS no O, unless
Olivia colman counts” [WAY] – Nope, sorry; [WO] - “V
There IS no V, unless Vivien Leigh or Virginia
McKenna count” [WAY] – Nope, sorry
Notes on Kevin’s Answers:
Dover Beach is by Matthew Arnold, English; Horatius… is Horatius at the Bridge
by Thomas
Babington McAulay, English; Ozymandius
is by Percy Bysshe Shelley, English; Second Coming is The Second
Coming by William Butler Yeats, Irish; Variations on
the Word Love is by Margaret Atwood, Canadian
General Player Comments:
[Mark Firth] – At least I recognized most answers this time!
[Andy Lischett] – I
could not find any female BAFTA winners for O or V, but confess to not scanning
screen writers,
cinematographers, and the rest.
I apologize for submitting Dennis DeLap
as a celebrated architect last time and wasting your time looking him up.
When Out of the WAY arrives
I copy the letters and categories to paper rather than write on my computer
screen, and
sometimes shorten the categories. I wrote only “Living
architects.” [WAY] – No problem,
honest error. On my end, it’s
all part of being a GM, as you well know. But, I can miss things and appreciate players when they take
the opportunity
to educate me when they are more versed in their
answers than I am (the poetry category this time is particularly
difficult for me as I’m not in any way a poetry
aficionado).
[Kevin Wilson]
– Well, at least the parks and restaurant chains were pretty easy. The rest,
ugh.
I’m not sure why I gravitated toward historical
military leaders. Hannibal and Drake immediately popped to mind so I
guess that set the trend.
Poetry and female BAFTA winners were tough. I’ve
never been much into poetry and other than Maggie Smith and
Judi Dench, couldn’t name more than a handful of
other possible winners. I would have thought the BAFTAs would
lean toward British actors and actresses but perusing
the lists it’s as much American as British so hmm….
Game Four, Round Three
Letters: E G M S T
Categories: Human Body Organ; Noted South
American Writer; Catholic Pope (not Anti-Pope);
Former Female Head of State; Non-Profit Organization
Current Standings
Scores by Category 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Now Previous Total
Kevin Wilson
10 9 8 8
10 45 + 41 =
86
Doug Kent
10 8 7 6 7 38 + 39 =
77
Mark Firth
10 8 7 6 8 39 + 35 =
74
Andy Lischett 10
7 6 7 6 36 + 32 =
68
Walt O’Hara
10 7 5 5 4 31 +
37 =
68
===================================
Deadline for the Next Issue of Out of the WAY:
February 9, 2022 at noon
See You Then!
Game entries, letters of
comment and other material can be sent to:
wandrew88 at gmail.com; or by post to: W. Andrew
York; POB 201117; Austin TX 78720-1117
Eternal Sunshine Game
Section
Diplomacy, “Indestructible Machine”,
2020A, F 11
Austria: Rick Davis – redavis914@aol.com - No units.
France: John David Galt – jdgalt@att.net - F Naples Supports A Rome, A Rome Supports F Naples.
Germany: Andy Lischett – andy@lischett.com – F Baltic Sea Hold, A
Bohemia - Vienna (*Bounce*),
A Budapest Hold, F
Edinburgh Hold, F English Channel – Brest, A Gascony – Spain, A Munich -
Berlin (*Bounce*),
F North Atlantic Ocean
Hold, F North Sea Supports F Edinburgh, A Portugal Orders the Champagne (Hold),
A Prussia - Berlin
(*Bounce*), A Sweden Hold, A Trieste Supports A
Budapest, A Tyrolia - Vienna (*Bounce*),
A Venice Hold.
Russia: Bob Durf – playdiplomacymoderator@gmail.com – No Retreat Received, A
Edinburgh Retreat OTB..
F Black Sea Unordered, F
Clyde – Liverpool, A Galicia - Budapest (*Fails*),
F Mid-Atlantic Ocean -
Portugal (*Fails*), A Moscow – Warsaw, A Norway Unordered,
A Rumania Supports A Galicia – Budapest, A Sevastopol – Moscow, A Silesia - Munich
(*Fails*).
Turkey: Jack McHugh - jwmchughjr@gmail.com – A Bulgaria Hold, F
Greece Supports A Bulgaria,
F Ionian Sea Supports F
Tunis, F Tunis Supports F Ionian Sea.
Thanks to Harold Reynolds
for the standby orders, which fortunately were not needed.
Supply Center Chart
Austria: Serbia=1
France: Naples, Rome=2
Germany: Belgium, Berlin, Brest, Budapest, Denmark,
Edinburgh, Holland, Kiel, London,
Marseilles, Munich,
Paris, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Trieste, Venice, Vienna=18 WINS!!
Russia: Liverpool, Moscow, Norway, Rumania,
Sevastopol, St Petersburg, Warsaw=7
Turkey: Ankara, Bulgaria, Constantinople, Greece,
Smyrna, Tunis=6
PRESS:
From: Czar Bob
From: Paparazzi
capture Czar Bob Aimlessly wandering St Petes after
one ally stabs him for the win and the other NMRs
Deadline for Eng Game Statements is February 12th at 7am My
Time
Diplomacy,
“Wine Lips”, 2020B, End Game
Austria (Harold Reynolds) - The Big Question
for Austria is: How can I survive? My neighbours
Italy and Russia can be either best buddies or mortal enemies. It is very
difficult to establish a working alliance with Turkey in which the threat of a
stab isn't always lurking in the shadows, so it's best to eliminate that threat
as soon as possible. I was fortunate in that both Italy and Russia were
interested in being allies, though Sid C. Czar was rather jittery and paranoid
at times (not without reason, as paranoia is as part of the Russian psyche as
it is for Austria).
The tricky part about the AIR alliance is making sure
that Italy gets a share of the spoils because it has the least growth
potential, but we managed to work things out and once Turkey had been subdued
(which I genuinely regretted doing), we were able to charge to the north and
west, aided by infighting and strategic NMRs from France and England. A
respectful bow is directed Germany's way for his determined resistance to
becoming a part of Greater Austria. Thank you, Heath and George, for putting up
with me and making this infrequent alliance work.
The game also allowed me to complete what is probably a
Diplomacy first, writing a limerick about each land space (and a couple of sea
spaces). This feat will remain unsung, I am sure. If you believe this is
evidence that I have no life, you are completely correct!
Thanks also to Doug, of course, without whom the game
would not have been possible. I wish a Happy New Year to you who read this and
those you care for.
Otto Weinlippen, Minister für alberne Spaziergänge
France (David Burgess) - Fun time gang! It was a weird one for sure. I usually look back and say I learn something
from every DIP game. But, this time....I'm not so sure.
I don't think I could have improved my outcome concerning the players on
the board. I think I did the best that I
could. Stay safe, wear a mask and don't
get caught with your pants down.
Italy (George Atkins) - This EOG is based mostly on my usual ironclad memory,
as I forgot where I put my summary notes.
As is normal, I sent
envoys to all embassies, looking to broker deals of friendship and/or potential
alliance. On the western side, I wanted the usual peace with France, but also
probed for some interest in Germany. With England, I hoped for some ongoing communications
or the possibility of a stronger relationship vis-à-vis France and/or Germany.
This did not turn out to be the situation, as England played his hand too close to the vest for
Italy to develop any meaningful campaign in that direction. OTOH, France was
quite engaging (and I wasn't sure if the French president wanted to be engaged,
as my French is très pauvre). We easily struck a deal
that pretty much held its course.
Mark (Germany) is a
nice guy, even for an Englander (!), and our discussions were amiable, though
not, in the end, terribly fruitful. That may be my fault, I expect, as I
eventually got consumed with the East, as often happens to Italy. Still, Mark
maintained a nice droll sense of humor in our letters. But,
he was concurrently in 3 or 4 games, which likely affected his play, as well.
And my decisions in the East put him against the wall. Sorry for that, Mark.
Still, I think my play
was, overall, disordinato, as we say in Rome; that
is, something of a shambles and lacking in depth. I'll own up that a lot of it
had to do with my inability to easily move back to a game of monthly deadlines,
like the old postal games where I seem to recall them being 3 or 4 weeks. I've
so gotten to email and online deadlines that I sometimes felt driftless. All my
fault, of course. But, it showed.
My initial plan to
work with Turkey against Austria fell apart early on. Differences in approach.
But in the east, I always try to find somebody willing to kick in with Italy
and make a go of it. As is usual, everybody punted that ball down the field.
Russia was understandably concerned about his other three neighbors reacting if
he looked too pro-Italian.
Finally, Turkey's
negotiations went sideways with Russia and Austria, who both allied to carve
the Sultan's carcass. Through my deft, if not, toadying diplomacy, I got in on
the deal and worked out a truce with Austria. Russia and I had been discussing
the Dual Monarchy for some time, but mostly to provide a defensive response if
the other was attacked. That was because Russia was trying to work with Austria
to go after Germany. That was my understanding, at least.
I think it was my idea
to just be up front and formalize our Turkish campaign into a 3-way alliance
against the west. Such things are difficult to arrange at the best of times;
and we spent a number of years probing each other, militarily and
diplomatically, trying to see if somebody was running a con. Let's face
it: If there was a clear opening for one
of us, I would have expected that person to take it. I sure would have, in
spite of my overtly peaceful and cooperative dialog. The object is to win, not
form a social club, right?
Still, the concept of
a working 3-way was intriguing and I wanted it to work; so
we all slowly removed our rear guards into visible, but non-threatening
positions. I think Russia and I were most concerned with Austria's growth. If
anybody was going to make a stab-and-run, it looked like him. Russia was still
hemmed in by England in the North and Austria was filling in the German dots. But, some additional diplomatic efforts paved the way for
Russia to start moving out.
France, bent on
revenge for what he saw as England's perfidy, struck a deal with Italy so that
it could move on England without interference. I was fine with that and worked
out some deals with my partners; France would ignore encroachments at home as
long as he retained enough troops to invest England. That's pretty much how it
played it, too. I also got along very well with David (France). Not that it
heavily influence my decisions, but it certainly helps
to have someone with whom you can discuss things, even when you disagree. Would
I have attacked France at some point? Sure, if it came to that and fit in with
my own plans. If France had been a jerk, liar, or just a worse player than me,
I would likely have adjusted my plans earlier on. In point of fact, I did more
or less help myself to several of his centers, even when I was not exactly up
front about it.
Otherwise, I'm sure I
exasperated several players, for which I apologize. My game was off, as I
noted. Not my best effort. But my wife will tell you I’m an exasperating
person, anyway.
Harold and Heath were
quite nice to work with, and we had the opportunity to get to know each other a
bit more, which was also fun. In fact, as a local president, I am inducting
Harold and Heath into the World Truckin' Association
as dues-paying members ("When you are blue, do all you can to try and be a
truckin' man"). Look out for those dues envelopes, boys.
Still, it was great
working with those guys and they helped me through some diplomacy doldrums here
and there. Harold and I had a difference of opinion about the cadence of one of
his limericks, but in spite of the fact that I'm sure he was wrong, I respect
the fact that it was his limerick, and it was perfectly fine by his standards.
Yet he composed a goodly amount of clever limericks,
did our Harold. :)
Naturalmente, graziea Douglas Kent for his
almost single-handedly keeping the "PBM" spirit of Diplomacy alive in
the Hobby for so long. I don't know where he gets the strength and endurance
(given all the work and the publication of DW, as well), other than the love of
the game. I'm way too much of a slacker (see, I admit it!) to even attempt that
kind of thing. In fact, I'm normally good for one game at a time. Anyway, it's
nice to see the game conclude at the end of the year; a nice synchronicity of
events. My thanks to the other players for falling by the wayside in so timely
a manner as to make this possible!
If I have any regrets,
other than my mediocre playing, it is the lack of press by me as well as other
players. Sure, we had some, but I was hoping to see a more active and
aggressive showing, especially as the game supported black press. I'll fess up,
as my limited press tended to be too obscure and self-indulgent. But even that
did not merit any serious press in response. C'mon, lads! Public press is such
a fun part of the game, and a great relief from all of the inner torment we go
through in our private press. Thank you again, Doug!
Russia (Heath
Davis-Gardner) - Well, well, well,
we made it!
I have a feeling there
will be some bitterness expressed here, probably by just one party, but maybe
more... and a lot of smack-talk about carebears and
all that jazz... I don't really want to get into a carebear
v cutthroat argument, but I will say this: I have rarely played in a Dip game
where I felt as forced into a diplomatic posture as I did here. Now, don't get
me wrong, I was more than happy to work with Austria and Italy. They wrote to
me more than anyone else, and over the years(!) that this (relatively short)
game has been running, I have to say, I now consider both of them true friends
(and also felt lucky to make
other new friends during this game).
But that said, I would
have liked to have been able to consider other options, particularly once I got
up to 7-8 SC. But even before then. The game started with my asking Turkey to
bounce in the Black Sea, followed by his telling me that was a declaration of
war (the request for a bounce). He was aggressively telling me it was F Sev - Rum or no deal. Of course, I can't have Turkey
aggressively tell me not to go to the Black Sea pre-S'01
and then fail to protect that space. So, in a weird way, the bounce was agreed
to, but in a "take this bounce and shove it" sense. I went ahead and
bounced him there, and he opened to Armenia as well (knowing his move to BLA
would fail, which is still puzzling to me). So after
that, Turkey and I started to talk through a potential accord. He would leave
Armenia, and I would move F Sev - Rum in S'02. At the
same time, Austria and Italy were inviting me to hit Turkey hard and eliminate
him ASAP. I really did want to consider working with Turkey from here, but we'd
lost so much tempo/momentum that it, from my judgment, it looked like working
with T starting in S'02 would just result in a big ol'
stalemate in the East. "Stabbing" Turkey (if I can even call it that)
would only gain me 1 SC, but I would probably never have to worry about the
Black Sea again.
So, even though Paul
and I actually started to have a really nice correspondence, I decided the best
option was to sign up for the A/I/Rhead. Paul was
quite cool/friendly/a good sport about that. I ended up regretting that we
started on the wrong foot. But that's how things went the way they did here.
Complicating matters was
an annoying English presence. The English player was fairly condescending to me
when I would write him messages proposing all sorts of means of cooperation.
Like, in one example, he told me how much my message made him sweat with
excitement, but then was just like "I'll respond later" and never
did. I did get a lot of English messages saying "I'll write you a message
later" and no messages came later. So when he
took StP, it was not a big shock. He NMRed on a crucial season that turned the tide of our conflict.
But later down the line he was offering me some help if I'd stab A/I, and I was
just kind of smiling and nodding, but I almost assumed the guy had to know I
couldn't trust him based on how our correspondence had gone. I thought it was
interesting that he had so much juice for complaining about draws later in the
game, but had never had the time to write me any sort of substantial message in
a Diplomacy game (especially in its early stages).
It was fulfilling to
see France take over all of England, because I think he'd been condescended to
as well. But it's kind of a bummer when pettiness results in sort of a forced
approach to a game. I wish that hadn't been the case here, it'd have been more
fun, but I still had a good time and thanks to all the players Most folks did
really participate a good deal in this game, even when the chips were down, and
even ol' England deserves credit for that. I never
had any doubt that he was going to do whatever he could to deny A/I/R the draw,
and if he'd had a slightly more substantial position (e.g.
if he hadn't NMRed when he did) I am quite sure he is
a fully capable and good tactical player who could have maybe stopped us or
forced one of us to do something rash, etc. Luckily, that wasn't the case in
this one, and we were able to pretty easily carve up Europe.
Thanks to my allies
for being true to their words all game, even if that inspires derision from
others - we're the ones who got to have the most fun in this one, and that's
all I really care about :) Good game to all
Sid C. Czar, aka Heath
D-G
Diplomacy,
“More Than Ever”, 2021A, F 01
Austria: Andy Lischett – andy@lischett.com – F Albania - Greece, A
Serbia Supports F Albania – Greece,
A Trieste - Budapest.
England: Paul Milewski – paul.milewski@hotmail.com – F North Sea - English Channel, F Wales - Irish Sea,
A Yorkshire Hold.
France: Brad Wilson - fullfathomfive675@gmail.com – A Burgundy – Belgium, F
Mid-Atlantic Ocean - Spain(sc),
A Spain - Portugal.
Germany: Heath Davis-Gardner – heathdavisgardner@gmail.com – F Denmark Hold, A Kiel – Holland,
A Ruhr - Munich.
Italy: John David Galt – jdgalt@att.net - F Ionian Sea Convoys A
Naples – Tunis, A Naples – Tunis,
A Venice Hold.
Russia: Simon Langley-Evans - slangers1964@gmail.com - F Gulf of Bothnia –
Sweden,
F Sevastopol – Rumania, A
St Petersburg – Norway, A Ukraine Supports F Sevastopol - Rumania.
Turkey: Jack McHugh - jwmchughjr@gmail.com – F Ankara - Constantinople
(*Fails*),
A Bulgaria - Greece (*Fails*), A
Constantinople - Bulgaria (*Fails*).
Supply Center Chart
Austria: Budapest, Greece, Serbia, Trieste, Vienna=5
Build
2
England: Edinburgh, Liverpool, London=3 Even
France: Belgium, Brest, Marseilles, Paris,
Portugal, Spain=6 Build
3
Germany: Berlin, Denmark, Holland, Kiel, Munich=5 Build
2
Italy: Naples, Rome, Tunis, Venice=4 Build
1
Russia: Moscow, Norway, Rumania, Sevastopol, St
Petersburg, Sweden, Warsaw=7 Build 3
Turkey: Ankara, Bulgaria, Constantinople, Smyrna=4
Build
1
PRESS
Paris to Vienna: You old fox, playing it cool, no one moves on you ...
propose concession to Austria-Hungary!
Paris to frozen tundra: Bundle up boys!
Lyon: We love Italy. Especially their coffee.
Deadline for W
01/S 02 is February 12th at 7am My Time
Winter will be
separated on two requests or more (I require two for 1901, or three for years
other than 1901)
Where in the World is
Kendo Nagasaki?
The Rules were in
Eternal Sunshine #131, read them if you want a detailed explanation and
examples. Basically, this is a guessing
game, trying to guess the mystery person and their location (both chosen by me
before the game started). Closest guess
gets a public clue and notification they were the closest. Everyone else sees the clue but has to figure
out on their own who was the closest that turn.
Turn 1
Kevin Wilson:
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto on Midway Island
John David Galt:
Charlie
Chaplin in Minsk, Belarus
Tom Howell:
John
Fetterman in Braddock, Pennsylvania
Brad Wilson:
Emily
Dickinson in Melbourne, Australia
Richard Smith:
Jaco Pastorius in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Simon Langley-Evans:
Lyndon
Johnson in Lima, Peru
Andy Lischett:
Millie Helper
in New Rochelle, New York
Dane Maslen:
Imran Khan in
Islamabad, Pakistan
Jack McHugh:
John Wilkes
Booth in Hanoi, Vietnam
Mark Firth:
Aage Bohr in
Medellín, Colombia
Hint to Person Placed
Closest to Me:
You were born after I died.
Wrong chromosome.
Turn 2
John David Galt:
Amelia
Earhart in Las Vegas, Nevada
Brad Wilson:
Billie Jean
King in Quebec City, Canada
Andy Lischett:
Bella Abzug
in Paris, France
Simon Langley-Evans:
Charles
Darwin in Port au Prince, Haiti
Richard Smith:
Carlota of
Mexico (Charlotte of Belgium) in Guadalajara, Mexico
Kevin Wilson:
Betsy Ross in
Paramaribo, Suriname
David Burgess:
Olivia
Newton-John in Venice, California
Dane Maslen:
Golda Meir in
Tel Aviv, Israel
Tom Howell:
U.S. General Richard
Arnold in Arkhangelsk, Russia
Mark Firth:
Thomas
Aquinas in Singapore
Jack McHugh:
Martin Luther
in Darwin, Australia
Hint to Person Placed
Closest to Me:
Correct chromosome.
Wrong occupation. We died within
a year of each other.
Turn 3
Brad Wilson:
Gertrude
Stein in Baltimore, Maryland
John David Galt:
Kamala Harris
in San Antonio, Texas
Richard Smith:
Lizzie Borden
in Brownsville, Texas
Kevin Wilson:
Emmeline
Pankhurst in Brownsville, Texas
Simon Langley-Evans:
Mamie
Eisenhower is in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Tom Howell:
Thérésa Tallien in Sao Paulo, Brazil
Andy Lischett:
Willa Cather
in Havana, Cuba
Dane Maslen:
Martha
Jefferson Randolph in Asunción, Paraguay
David Burgess:
Jim Boeheim in
Syracuse, New York
Mark Firth:
Emmeline
Pankhurst in Houston, Texas
Jack McHugh:
Richard
Wagner in Havana, Cuba
Hint to Person Placed
Closest to Me:
We each entertained people, in our individual ways.
Turn 4
Brad Wilson:
Bessie Smith
in Miami, Florida
Richard Smith:
Isadora
Duncan in Austin, Texas
Dane Maslen:
Marie
Bonfanti in Guatemala City, Guatemala
Simon Langley-Evans:
Sara
Bernhardt is in Dover, Delaware
Andy Lischett:
Isadora
Duncan in Merida, Mexico
John David Galt:
Tina Turner
in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Kevin Wilson:
Bessie
Coleman in Kingston, Jamaica
Mark Firth:
Lillie
Langtry in Sana’a, Yemen
Tom Howell:
Louisa Alice
Baker in Belmopan, Belize
Jack McHugh:
Isadora
Duncan in Mexico City, Mexico
David Burgess:
Mati Hari in
El Paso, TX
Hint to Person Placed Closest to Me:
I’ve been correctly identified, but not by you. Wrong occupation. We died within five years of each other.
Turn 5
Kevin Wilson:
Bessie
Coleman in La Esperanza, Honduras
John David Galt:
Tina Turner
in San Salvador, El Salvador
Tom Howell:
Isadora
Duncan in Belize City, Belize
Brad Wilson:
Tina Turner
in San Juan, Puerto Rico
Richard Smith:
Isadora
Duncan in Chihuahua City, Mexico
Andy Lischett:
Isadora
Duncan in Belize City, Belize
Simon Langley-Evans:
Sarah
Bernhardt in Chihuahua, Mexico
Dane Maslen:
Bessie Smith
in Cancún, Mexico
David Burgess:
Isadora Duncan
El Paso, Texas
Mark Firth:
Isadora
Duncan in Cancun, Mexico
Hint to Person Placed Closest to Me:
You know who I am (and you’re not the only one) but not
where I am.
Turn 6
John David Galt:
Isadora
Duncan in Havana, Cuba
Simon Langley-Evans:
Isadora
Duncan is in Coban, Guatemala
Richard Smith:
Isadora
Duncan in Flores, Petén, Guatemala
Tom Howell:
Isadora
Duncan in Tikal, Guatemala
Dane Maslen:
Isadora
Duncan in Flores, Petén, Guatemala
Andy Lischett:
Isadora
Duncan in Flores, Guatemala
Brad Wilson:
Tina Turner
in Panama City, Panama
David Burgess:
Isadora
Duncan in New Orleans, Louisiana
Mark Firth:
Isadora
Duncan in George Town, Cayman Islands
Hint to Person Placed Closest to Me:
You know who I am (and you’re not the only one) but not
where I am. You’re getting colder.
Turn 7
Simon Langley-Evans:
Isadora
Duncan in Chetumal, Mexico
Dane Maslen:
Isadora
Duncan in La Democracia, Belize
John David Galt:
Isadora
Duncan in Albuquerque, New Mexico
Brad Wilson:
Isadora
Duncan in San Jose, Costa Rica
Richard Smith:
Isadora
Duncan in Chetumal, Mexico
Andy Lischett:
Isadora
Duncan in Little Swan Island, Honduras
Tom Howell:
Isadora
Duncan in Chetumal, Mexico
David Burgess:
Isadora
Duncan in Tabasco, Mexico
Mark Firth:
Isadora
Duncan in Orange Walk Town, Belize
Jack McHugh:
Isadora
Duncan in Ecatepec de Morles, Mexico
Kevin Wilson:
Isadora
Duncan in Valladolid, Mexico
Hint to Person Placed Closest to Me:
You know who I am (and you’re not the only one) but not
where I am. You’re getting closer.
Deadline for Turn 8 is February 12th at 7am My Time
By Almost Popular Demand
I’ve
run this game (or By Popular Demand, of which this is a variant) a number of
times in Eternal Sunshine. The rules are
simple: I supply you with five categories.
You send in an answer, trying to choose the answer which will match with
other people’s but NOT be the most popular.
Research IS permitted. You get
one point for each person who submitted the answer you gave, including yourself. However, the most popular answer in every
category scores ZERO. So, if
you and two other people send in the same answer that’s three points. You also get to choose a Joker category,
where the points are doubled. If you don’t
specify a Joker, it gets applied to the first category listed (so you don’t
“lose” the Joker). Always answer for
every category: any answer is legal, and will earn a point even if you’re the
only person to give it. High score after
ten categories wins. Any player who
joins after the first round starts with the lowest score so far; if you join
starting in Turn 3 and the person doing the worst has 27 points so far, that’s
what you start with. Also
if you miss a turn, you get the lowest score that round rather than zero. This makes the game more competitive and
keeps you playing even if you arrive late or forget to play one turn. Turn 10 is worth double points.
Turn 3 Categories:
1.
Something you need a new one of every year.
2.
A streaming service.
3.
A color of ball point pen ink.
4.
Something you find in a lunch box.
5.
A movie about the Vietnam War.
Joker category shown in BOLD. Most popular answer shown in strikethrough.
David Burgess gets the high score of 13
this round (out of a possible 15). Brad
Wilson, after getting the high score last round, gets the low score this time with
1 point.
Comments by Category:
Something
you need a new one of every year: Brad Wilson – “Well, my father would say
"wife", but ..” Andy Lischett
– “My Once-a-year answer should score 1 point, and any reasonable answer is too
dangerous.” Mark Firth – “Seemed
timely.”
A
streaming service: Andy
Lischett – “My
Streaming answer may match someone if I'm lucky.” Kevin Wilson – “Avoid Netflix, Prime and Hulu.” Mark Firth – “Should take one risk.”
A
color of ball point pen ink: Andy Lischett – “A green pen
is my Joker, as black, blue and red are dangerous (which Carol proved after I'd
made my choices).” David Burgess – “I
flipped a coin on Blue or Black...Black won.”
Kevin Wilson – “Blue is probably the most common and popular so avoiding
that.” Mark Firth – “Not had one in a
while.”
Something
you find in a lunch box: Andy Lischett – “My first
thought for Something in a lunch box was a rat, then I thought that disgusting
and my next thought was a bomb, so I settled on a Twinkie.” Kevin Wilson – “Avoiding the obvious sandwich.” Mark Firth – “Always.” [[GM Note – For
this category I chose to let answers be as specific as possible. PBJ is a sandwich, but it is a distinct kind
of sandwich so those two answers do not match.
Likewise, Potato Chips and Crisps in most cases are the same but not
necessarily, so I’m not combining those either.
Apple and fruit, same thing.]]
A
movie about the Vietnam War: Brad Wilson – “Isn't Robert Duvall great in this? Near
top of my "should have won an Oscar list" with Robert Preston for
Victor! Victoria! and Jessica Tandy and Gene Saks for "Nobody's Fool." Andy Lischett – “I
had no strategy for the Vietnam movie, but picked The Deer Hunter because I
like Pennsylvania.” Kevin Wilson – “Risks
being popular but I think something like Good Morning Vietnam might slide ahead.” Mark Firth – “Hopefully a big spread here.”
General
Comments:
Andy Lischett – “I just realized that nonsense
answers ("Cat" for a ballpoint pen color) for all categories will score
6 points. Had I realized that before I could have had 12 instead of 11 heading
into Turn 3.” David Burgess – “I came
close to just saying the most off the wall answers to guarantee 1 point for
each question. With the joker that would
guarantee me 6 each round. But, that is the exact score I have gotten after 2
rounds...12. So, why not try??? Guess I will gamble with real answers.” [[Two
people with the same thought. Playing it
safe in BAPD will keep you from the bottom, but you’ll never win that way.]]
Turn 4 Categories –
Remember to Specify a Joker Category
1.
Something you keep in a safe.
2.
A brand of cigarettes.
3.
A stock market index.
4.
Something associated with Valentine’s Day.
5.
A precious gem.
Deadline for Turn 4 is February 12th at 7am My Time
Deadline for the next issue of Eternal Sunshine is: Saturday
February 12, 2022 at 7am My Time (U.S. central time) – some games and subzines earlier